Tuesday, February 08, 2011
Monday, January 10, 2011
Iranian regime rewrites the story of Esther
Wednesday, December 22, 2010
Monday, December 13, 2010
Antisemitism: the anti-imperialism of fools
Wednesday, January 13, 2010
"These things were written down for our instruction"
UCU: A schizophrenic union?
Thursday, December 10, 2009
UCU: can the last one out, please turn out the lights
Tuesday, December 08, 2009
Tuesday, November 10, 2009
Monday, November 09, 2009
EMEU: taking the ostrich approach towards antisemitism?
You can read about Evangelicals for Middle East Understanding here. I have no particular problem with their mission statement - at least in principle; though the fact that they appear to be either unaware of or indifferent towards Israeli Messianic Jews, and implicitly condemn Israeli counterterrorism measures without condemning (or even mentioning) Palestinian terrorism gives me little confidence that EMEU has much more than a one-sided anti-Israel agenda. Anyway, they've got an executive briefing coming up, which you can read about here. You'll note that one of the speakers is Sami Awad of Bethlehem Bible College, whose radical anti-Zionist stance you can read about here, and of course Reverend Dr Stephen Sizer PhD, whose antisemitic (there is no other word for it) output I have written about in detail here and here. (Sizer has yet to make any adequate response whatsoever.) Let's hope the other speakers are a sight better, or the chances of the Executive Briefing furthering Middle East "Understanding" are slim indeed.
Tuesday, October 27, 2009
Future Israel conference
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Wonders never cease
Tuesday, September 01, 2009
Medieval style antisemitism in a modern European newspaper
Friday, August 14, 2009
Friday, August 07, 2009
A simple question to Daniel Blanche.
Daniel has blogged approvingly about Ben White's book, Israeli Apartheid: A Beginner's Guide, here.
When I and others began to challenge Daniel about White's use of fake quotes, citation of Holocaust Denier Roger Garaudy as an authoritative source, and use of other dubious sources, Daniel pulled out of the debate.
I have twice posted the following question on this post on Blanche's blog. Twice it has been deleted. The question is as follows:
"Daniel: do you think it is acceptable for your friend Ben White to cite the Holocaust Denier Roger Garaudy as an authoritative source and to use fake quotes in his book?"
I have just posted my question for a third time. I await to see whether Blanche will answer, or will go on courageously deleting.